
Discuss the view that the tort of nervous shock is governed more by policy than by legal principles Victoria railway nervous shock was not recognized- floodgates dulieu v white 1901 first pillow slip (primaryvictim page v smith 0 physical wounding = automatic shout bourhill v young bystander alock- three part test: unaided sense eyesight incident or immediate aftermath mcloughlin v obrian nigh ties of love and estimation whitevchief constable The various requirements developed in raF entail that the theory of success is slim. estate of the realm based tort exact obligation ( liable even if not negligent ) Blackburn j any person who brings onto land, escapes and causes damage Giles v walker bring onto land pass read v lyons Damage Cambridge v e! astern countries leather Defences acts of peculiar rockards v Lothian volenti statutory authority jet-propelled plane v Chelsea dent of the claimant act of god Nichols v marsland professor Rogers notes that Rylands v. Fletcher has comparatively seldom been the basis of a successful claim in the position courts since 1900 rule operates within a constrict compass and seldom leads to a liability the could not have been established...If you want to beat a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment