Public Schools Segregation Essay

I was recently struck by atomic number 53 of the semipolitical cartoons in the SacramentoBee newspaper, which presented an image comparison of drinking fountains in devil schools. It quickly reminded me of the racist Jim Crow laws from the 1880s-1960s and how racial segregation existed almost everyplace in the United States at that time. However, I realize that this cartoon doesnt portray the concept of racial segregation with a Jim Crow joke, just it makes a commentary on neighborly segregation among frequent schools in the United States right away.I slowly realized that all Ameri seat public schools are non the akin due to funding. The huge difference exists in the public school system because their funding is associated with local property taxes. If a school is located in an monied area with wealthier residents who impart postgraduate property taxes, schools depart receive more(prenominal) funding (School Funding 1). Do you think this system is white? If I ask afflu ent parents, they believably would answer that they pay high property taxes, so their money should go straight to nourish public schools in their areas.Meanwhile, if I were to ask parents in low socioeconomic areas, they would say that cash in hand should be distributed from the state and not by the county, which would help in trim back the inequality between schools. Although sacramental manduction funds is not fair for some affluent people who pay more taxes, we should encourage state governments to aid the paltryer schools more because it helps to reduce penury and prevent crimes in rase income neighborhoods. The first lawsuit that poorer schools should withdraw more funds is to reduce poverty.People in low-income areas might not get the direct effect from school funding, but in the future, their kids will be benefited greatly. For those in the low income bracket, raising can be a verit fitting way to help them climb out of poverty. However, in reality, most of these poorer schools today are still not treated equally as their richer counterparts. Lisa Black, lettuce Tribune reporter reviewed the vast difference between two public schools in the Chicago area to illustrate this point.The first school, Taft Elementary School in Lockport cant offer students any arts, language or engine room classes because of the limited budget available. Meanwhile, Rondout Elementary School, near Lake Forest, offers language programs such as Spanish in every grade including kindergarten. Most students use laptops in the class, and they can enjoy band and chorus classes. They can admit to ask various art, drama and dance as well (Black 1). If poor children had the same probability as their counterparts, imagine the growth it could represent to them educational.If they enjoyed studying, they could move on to obtain high education by attending to colleges, meaning better-paying jobs. Therefore, funds should be available for all people. Young minds deserve the op portunity to choose the programs that they want to study. They should be able to study art and any former(a) subject, as they desire to, regard slight of how much property tax their parents pay. In general, I swear that a good education is the foundation that can pave the way to a better quality of life.Aside from reducing poverty, preventing crimes is anformer(a) motive that poorer schools should receive more funds. Crimes in lower income areas subtract from being unable to sustain a decent living. These types of crimes can be directly connected to a lack of education and opportunity. Geoffrey Wodtke, a sociologist at the University of Michigan, mentions in his article that kids in poor neighborhood micturate less chance to graduate from high school (Wodtke 1). He also states brusk neighborhoods are isolated and racially segregated, with none of the quality schools, day care, market place stores, pharmacies, and parks that can help promote a childs development and academic ach ievement and they are disproportionately smoggy, crime-ridden and dilapidated. All of these factors, the researchers note, have been linked to poor performance in school, often culminating in dropouts. (1) Wodtke claims that poor neighborhoods affect school performance, and this can impact a childs learning directly.some(a) children quit the schools because they have no participation in schooling. Dropping out is and having no high school diploma will limit a job opportunities. When they are not qualified for many jobs, they cant escape the pitfalls of poverty. Therefore, some of them end up finding illegal ways to make money while others affiliate themselves with gangs (Wodtke 2). This is the reason why school is so important, because it is a good place to bring out children on equal footing educationally with the chance to better themselves in the future.However, schools in low-income areas still need more funds to afford having a variety of programs such as language, art and s ports. Schools also need to be able to hire and retain qualified teachers. Moreover, every school should be able to afford sport programs, which is a good physical military issue for youthful energy and encourages good health and teamwork. Art programs should also be available because they provide an outlet to express creativity. A wider variety of activities and educational alternatives can create brighter and more promising futures if given the opportunities.These children can acquire doctors, football players or artists in the future as long as they get a fair amount of support from the beginning. Its hard to change the living environment in poorer neighborhoods, but we can sound by improving the school system to reshape the future of that community. Some people think that pouring money into poor schools is wasteful. They believe the reason schools draw poorly performing ones is because they are full of under-achieving students who lack interest in the curriculum. Even if so me schools get more funds, it will not change anything.Its like treating symptoms, but not starting at the root of the problem. They believe that the government should provide more funding to schools with higher achieving students who potentially will become successful contributing members of the community. In other words, the state government should invest in the right schools and students. However, I believe this thought to be completely wrong. People who believe this will never know the potential of students in lower-income schools unless they are given a fair and equal opportunity to succeed.If poorer schools receive more funding, they will be able to provide better facilities and a stronger variety in the curriculum. These factors would increase the chances that we notice more students grow into productive and successful adults despite coming from lower class surroundings. When every school has the same resources and variety of programs available to their youths, political car toons like this one will be a thing of the recent because the educational systems inequalities will no longer be a joke.We should call for action on the funding to reform poorer schools because education can help in reducing poverty and crimes in these neighborhoods. Although affluent parents who work harder and pay more property taxes might oppose an liking of distributed funding to poor schools, they should think about economic consequences. If a commotion between rich schools and poor schools is still expanding, how can the children of today become responsible adults in the future?If this country is the land of freedom and opportunity for everyone, I should hope that schools would be the first place to start by giving equal opportunities to all children. Poorer schools should receive equal opportunities like those of the children in wealthier communities. Schools should be a sacred place where all children of any social standing are afforded the same opportunities of unlimited educational growth. The more we guarantee children shine in their youth, the more likely they will rise up to become successful in the future and this will help sustain the future of the United States socially and economically.