Playing Monopoly Essay

1. Identify the behaviors that you think of are ethicall(a)y confutable in the history of Microsoft. Evaluate the ethics of these behaviors.Pretend to embrace a engineering science and become the major source for that technology like corrupt come out of the closet the competitors. Declare it obsolete beca commit your original way is better.Wait large abounding for a technique or thinker to be disregarded by the majority of people or just long enough that the majority of your followers are naive revolutionarybies. Bring out the grey-haired idea and present it as a new invention. For example, m any(prenominal)(prenominal) things in Visual Studio .Net are presented as new ideas even though they have existed in RAD tools like Delphi for over a decade. wherefore this works? because the majority of new software geeks have no idea what Delphi is and didnt know that you could do everything exactly the way Microsoft claims you ass in their new invention.It is very much clear abo ut incidences that Microsoft has been unethical in its approaches. Rather that applying their own thoughts, most of the products they have throw outd by copying ideas unethically from different competitors products. Rather than having the reasonable competition in the market Gates always tried to monopolize the market. Though all the monopoly has brought him profit but ethically Microsoft didnt.2. What characteristics of the market for run administrations do you think created the monopoly market that MIcrosofts operational system enjoyed?Evaluate the market in terms of utilitarianism, rights and justice (your analysis should make use of the textbooks discussion of the effects of monopoly markets on the utility of participants in the market, on the virtuous rights of participants in the market, and on the distribution of the benefits and burdens among participants in the market), giving explicit examples from the in operation(p) sytems industry to illustrate your pull downs. Some of the characteristics of the market that created monopoly market that Microsofts operating system enjoyed are as follows Incorporation of variant Microsoft applications like Windows digital Media Player andInternet adventurer in 1995 with its operating system gave an prefer to the confederation as this monopoly worked out for them. Users using Windows didnt wish themselves to exact into trouble of purchasing a different browser and different Media Payer. Users were in addition non ready to pay extra money for buying early(a) companies applications, as all those applications were readily available with Microsofts operating system.every company was cathartic their applications and operating systems in the market and every sentence Microsoft was able to know their programs. Using those programs Microsoft created monopoly in the market by releasing advanced version of competitors products. As when Navigator came in 1994, Microsoft launched Internet Explorer which was b orrowed from Spyglass Inc. and made it similar to Navigator. It incorporated Internet Explorer with Windows. Media player was overly incorporated in Windows. Sun Microsystemss Java was in like manner licensed to Microsoft first and then Microsoft built its own Microsoft java permitting Windows Users to be compatible with it.In the software industry users did non want to shift to new products or applications until proper training and workshops are organized. Microsofts apply mature strategies for training users. With the Installation disk, a proper tour of Windows is provided to facilitate user.3. In your view, should the goverment have sued Microsoft for vilolation of the antitrust law? In your view, was judge Jacksons order that Microsoft be broken into two comanies fair to Microsoft? Was judge Killar-Kotellys november 1, 2003 decision fair? Was the April 2004 decision of the Eruopean Comission fair to Microsoft? explicate your answers.USA attorney General Janet Reno filed a n antitrust suit against Microsoft in the court of pretend doubting Thomas Jackson. Microsoft made the calculator companies using Windows as their operating system not to license, distribute or promote competitive software products of separate companies. It introduce Internet Explorer with Windows and thus demolished consumer freedom to go for any other Browser plus it also degraded windows performance. In the agreements with figurer companies those using Windows, Microsoft wanted them to leave Internet Explorer as the oversight WebBrowser and didnt permit installation of any other browser. The judge was having complete authorityto take hard actions against Microsofts unethical business strategies. As per the case study it is unornamented that Microsoft has used various unethical business strategies to make their business profitable. Microsoft copied the copyright of Apples OS/2 and developed its own operating system on the same line.Moreover they forced users to use its Inte rnet Explorer and digital media player. They suppressed the platform independent functionality of Suns Java by releasing Microsofts Java and making it cross platform language. In my view, government should not have sued Microsoft. Consumers were well satisfied by Windows which was evident from the market share of its use. So signing of agreement involves approval of selective information processing system companies and Microsoft and if computer companies have signed that agreement that means they werent having any problems and neither consumers upon implementing the agreement. So Microsoft just used a marketing dodging over here. Judge Jacksons order was fair for the competitors as well as for the software industry because Microsoft has really invoked the monopoly situation in the market. It was essential to have fair competition in the market. As an operating system and applications are totally two different aspects and Microsoft should not fellowship these two aspects. This or der would have helped competitors and users to choose their favorite applications. From Microsofts point of view it was not the fair decision, as they never wish to set out their business into two domains. It was a marketing strategy adopted by Microsoft so that it can withstand with the competition.According to them it also facilitated consumers for not disbursal their money in buying other corresponding software and also playing a risk of installing and uninstalling. According to the settlement among Microsoft and DOJ, Microsoft was asked to share its application programing interface with other software rivals and to allow users to hide Internet Explorer icon from the screen. It was asked not to prevent other competitors programs to install on its operating system and not to retaliate against computer makers in releasing their products. This settlement was officially approved by Judge Kollar-Kotelly on November 1, 2003. The decision was really fair for the competitors as well as users. The decision has created free competitive market in the software industry. It allows users to use other available applications and allow them to hide icons which they do not want to use. From competitors point of view market became much more open to release moreproducts with advanced technologies. This move also helped people to think out of Microsofts box and helped to showcase their technical skills. As a go out various new operating systems with better performance than Windows like Linux, Suse, Knoppix, and Solaris came in market.4. Who, if anyone is harmed by the kind of market that Microsofts operating system has enjoyed? Explain your answer.What kind of public policies, if any, should we have to deal with industries like the operating system industry. Monopoly of Microsofts operating system has harmed everyone from users to computer producers. Due to unavailability of fair market the users were bound to use Microsofts operating system and applications. They were un availing to hide icons of the Microsofts applications from their operating system. From producers point of view, they were not free to launch Windows compatible applications due to unavailability of Windows application programming interface in the market. The competition became minimal in the market due to monopoly enjoyed by Microsoft. Due to monopoly in the market one single company Microsoft was holding maximum market share. It hampered the technical advancement and innovation in the market as well. Some of the following public policies could be used to deal with monopoly Government should issue some standards for a given technology/system/product which should be followed by everyone in the industry.Anti-monopoly law can be created to prevent monopoly to occur in the market.Some policies can be incorporated in the system to motivate and encourage newly launched companies to summation the innovation in the market.Some policies should be made to share information among the compan ies whose applications are inter dependant.